It’s said that dogs sniff
each other as a kind of canine equivalent to the human handshake; an otherwise
meaningless “greeting ceremony”1 which reportedly started in
medieval times as a way of checking the other guy for weapons. Our canine
companions are said to do this for similar reasons; it signifies that both
animals are willing to start out on friendly terms.
But is it really just a social
gesture? Does it have an adaptive purpose? Will knowing the true reason for
this behavior tell us anything useful about the dog’s way of seeing the world?
And perhaps more importantly, will it tell us anything about ourselves?
We know that at least 33% of
a dog’s brain is devoted to processing olfactory information while in humans
that figure is closer to about 5%.
Marc Bekoff wrote here
recently in “Yellow Snow
Can Tells Us About What a Dog’s Nose Knows.” that “[a dog’s nose]
can distinguish T-shirts worn by identical twins, follow odor trails, and are
10,000 times more sensitive than humans to certain odors.”
“Odors are powerful
stimulants,” Bekoff continues. “Although my late companion dog, Jethro (aka
Hoover), enjoyed visiting his veterinarian, he showed fear if he went into an
examination room where the previous canine client was afraid.”
Steven R. Lindsay writes,
“Olfactory information is highly durable in dogs. They exhibit evidence of
recognizing the scent of the mother and the breeder after years of separation,
social memories that may persist throughout a dog’s life.” (Handbook of
Applied Dog Behavior and Training: Adaptation and Learning, 2000, p. 228.)
So if a dog’s nose can pick
up information from yellow snow, from the fear that hangs in the air after
another dog leaves a veterinary examination room, from scents left behind by the shoes of
an escaped prisoner, or from lifting its nostrils to the wind, why would a dog
need to stick his nose directly into another dog’s snout, genitals, and nether
regions to garner social information? Couldn’t he do that at a “safer”
distance? And if the emotional memories sparked by familiar scents are so
durable, why would dogs need to continue sniffing each other every time they
meet even after they’ve already established a social relationship?
Dog trainer and natural
philosopher Kevin Behan
has a unique way of looking at canine behavior. Most of us tend to view such
phenomena from the top down or from the outside in. As a result we
overcomplicate things. Behan does just the opposite. He sees things from the
inside out, and in so doing he’s developed a very simple theory of “behavior as
energy,” sort of the E = MC2 of animal consciousness if you will, except it
would probably be written as C = ME2, where C is consciousness, M is momentum,
and E is emotional energy. (I just made that up, of course; I don’t think Behan
has such an equation.)
In the “Why Dogs Do
What They Do“ section of his website, Behan makes a very interesting
and apt observation, “When people meet and greet, they shake hands or touch in
some way, and they exchange pleasantries. And when dogs meet and greet, they
smell each other. However people don’t reintroduce themselves periodically
throughout their interaction or every time they meet especially if they know
each other well, whereas dogs smell each other each and every time they meet,
no matter how well they may ‘know’ each other.”
Like a lot of Kevin’s
observations this one comes as both a bit of a surprise and a “Huh, I hadn’t
thought about it but that’s true...” realization.
I had three dogs staying with
me this weekend. Two of them, Dougie and Muskoka, see each other at least twice
a week. They spend a lot of time together, they’ve known each other for years,
they’re best buds, they don’t need to “shake hands” every time they run into
one another. Yet on Saturday, when Dougie’s owners dropped him off, the first
thing he and Muskoka did, right there on my front stoop, was sniff each other.
Why do dogs need to do this?
Behan says it’s a way of
grounding themselves. “Anytime there is ... any change, any stimulus or
stimulation, and especially when stressed, dogs need to smell something.”
That’s a simple and yet very
intriguing observation. And you can see it for yourself in the way a dog who’s
momentarily frightened when a book falls to the floor, for example, will first
react to the noise and then cautiously, and somewhat mysteriously, go over to
sniff the offending object. I’ve also seen a dog notice that another dog is
whimpering in his sleep. And she’ll come over, and, while the other dog is
still dreaming, very gingerly sniff his snout.
Behan explains, “[Any] change
in the dog’s sensory perception of a situation generates nervous activity in
its brain, and this of course is neuro-chemical electrical energy. My proposal
is that this electrochemical energy acts just like electricity in that it wants
‘to run to ground.’”
He also says that too much
electricity creates a disconnect between the “big brain” in the head and the
“little brain” in the solar plexus, and that inhaling the smell of something is
a way of restoring internal balance.2
“Smelling is that primal,”
says Behan. “It allows the dog to connect with its ‘self’ and quite literally
feel the ground beneath its feet.”
It’s primal in humans too.
What happens when you stop and smell the roses? It makes you feel good; you can
feel your chest expand. What happens when a tantalizing smell comes wafting
toward you from a pizza joint? You feel it in your gut. What happens when you
find the scent of your lover’s perfume on a scarf she’s left behind? You
experience a rush of sexual desire. Whenever we smell something pleasant we’re
instantly taken “outside of ourselves;” we leave behind all the thoughts that
were buzzing around in our brains, and we experience, if just for a fleeting
moment, what it’s like just to be in a body.
As has been discussed in several
previous articles here,3 human beings have an innate tendency to
anthropomorphize animals, i.e., “when dogs sniff each other it’s the canine
equivalent of shaking hands.” But I think that in order to truly understand
canine behavior we sometimes need to dogthropomorphize ourselves.
Spanish philosopher Jose
Ortega y Gasset once pondered the handshake. “Man—let us never forget, was once
a wild beast, and, potentially he continues to be one to a greater or lesser
degree. Hence the approach of man to man was always a possible tragedy. What
today seems to us such a simple and easy thing—one man approaching another—was
until recently a dangerous and difficult operation. So it was necessary to
invent a technique of approach.” (Jose Ortega y Gasset, Man and People, 1963, p. 207)
I had an important meeting
the other day, and I was a bit nervous coming into the room. Then, as I shook
hands with everyone there, I tried to tune-in to what effects, if any, it had
on me. And sure enough, each handshake actually made me feel less nervous and
more balanced, as if the soles of my feet were planted more firmly on solid ground.
(I’m not sure that happens every time we shake hands, but it was an interesting
feeling, and one I had never noticed before.)
Dogs can’t “categorize”
things. For instance, while we might say that Dougie and Muskoka are “friends,”
and they’re certainly friendly toward one another, they don’t put things into
conceptual chunks, store them in a mental library, and retrieve them for future
reference. In other words, they don’t think of themselves as friends, they just
feel it. We, on the other hand, can sometimes think too much. That’s why it’s
so pleasant to escape our thoughts when we “stop and smell the roses.”
So maybe Kevin Behan’s
explanation for this behavior is correct. After all, when we shake hands with
strangers we can categorize them afterward and put them into our mental
library, and so we won’t necessarily need to shake their hands again. And yet
the first time we do engage in that ancient social ritual, it’s entirely
possible that on the most basic level we’re kind of doing what dogs do when they sniff
each other’s butts. We’re grounding our
energy.
LCK
“Life Is an Adventure—Where Will Your Dog Take You?”
Join Me on Facebook!
Follow Me on Twitter!
Join the Rescue Dog Owners Support Group!
“Life Is an Adventure—Where Will Your Dog Take You?”
Join Me on Facebook!
Follow Me on Twitter!
Join the Rescue Dog Owners Support Group!
Footnotes:
1) The rationale for
“shaking” hands was to see if there was anything up the other guy’s sleeve,
which reminds me of the famous Marx Brothers scene where the policeman is
shaking Harpo’s hand and with each shake, enormous amounts of silverware keep
dropping out of Harpo’s sleeve.
Interestingly, when elephants
meet, they often greet each other by touching each other’s mouth with the tip
of the trunk. Sometimes they’ll even grasp their trunks together, almost
imitating the ancient Roman hand clasp.
In Hyenas: “Exposure of
vulnerable parts to the other partner is also characteristic of hyena
greetings. They stand head to tail, lift the hind quarter nearest to the
partner, raise their tails, erect their penis (males) or pseudopenis (females),
and sniff and lick each other’s erect “penis,” scent gland, and anus.” (Filippo
Aureli, Frans B. M. Waal, Natural Conflict Resolution, 2000, p. 94)
Orca pods will
approach each other in line formation and then stop about 20 meters away from one another. After a short time they swim towards each other and become
extremely excited as they engage in physical caresses, swim in tight groups,
and often display erections. This activity occurs when the pods first meet after the winter absence or before departing. It has also been recently
associated with the presence of a sick pod member.
In Howler Monkeys: “Greetings
are a conflict management mechanism used between males of similar ranks. The
fission-fusion social system of this group of howlers allows males with
conflicting interests to remain separated, and greetings may reduce tension
during fusion events.” (“The functions of the Greeting Ceremony among male
mantled howlers (Alouatta palliata) on Agaltepec Island, Mexico,” Pedro Américo
D. Dias et al.)
2) Behan’s position stems
from a very simple proposition (so simple you may find yourself going,
“What?”). He says that the primary, bedrock environmental factor shaping the
evolution of life on earth is gravity. This natural force deeply influences not
only the evolution of organisms but their behavior as well (non-human and human
animals alike are always concerned, albeit unconsciously, with maintaining
their physical balance). The second factor is the need to absorb energy from
the environment in order to sustain life. Behan calls this “hunger” (though in
my view it should also include thirst and the need to breathe). “Animal
consciousness,” Behan says, “is the confluence of the two most primordial
systems by which every animal functions, the primal circuits dedicated to
balance and the primal circuits dedicated to hunger.” He then goes on to
suggest that when dogs greet each other they’re essentially motivated by a need
to “ingest” the other dog’s energy, and that smelling, which is often a
precursor to eating, is the safest way to do that. (Personally, I’m still
trying to “digest” that idea.)
3) “How Man
Creates Dog in His Own Image,” Lee Charles Kelley, “Anthropomorphic
Double Talk,” Marc Bekoff, “Naturalizing
Anthropomorphism,” Alexandra Horowitz (cited in Bekoff’s article,
above)m “The Debate
Between Emotion and Logic,” Lee Charles Kelley.
No comments:
Post a Comment