The protesters want
change; dogs are designed to help them.
Originally published in slightly
different form on May 20, 2010 at
PsychologyToday.com.
In the Greek capital, any
dogs found roaming the streets are taken in, neutered, and given vaccinations.
Then they’re outfitted with a blue collar, denoting their “stray” status, and
released back into the city. They reportedly sleep peacefully on the streets,
sidewalks, and even at the Parthenon, where they’ve become something of a tourist
attraction.
As you probably know,
Greece has been rocked recently by violent protests over the government’s
“austerity program1.” And some of the city’s stray dogs have now
seemingly joined the rioters, perhaps in a show of solidarity.
The AP
reports: “Photographers have documented the presence of several
yellowish dogs at boisterous anti-government protests over the years, barking
and baring their teeth at police in what appears to be canine political
statements. One [such dog], Kanellos ... was a constant companion for over a
decade to anarchist rioters until he died, in July 2008.”
Kanellos still has his own Facebook page,
with 10,000+ fans and a song dedicated to him. According to the New York Post,
one fan asked, “What brings him to the riots? Does he believe in the overthrow
of private ownership? Does he see the rioters as his pack?”
Since not all the stray
dogs in Athens have joined the protesters, and since we don’t have enough
details on how the two or three dogs who have are actually behaving, it’s a mistake to try and
draw any conclusions about all canine behavior from this phenomenon.
Nevertheless, whenever we come upon a unique, naturally-occurring behavior in
dogs (i.e., one that happens spontaneously and isn’t induced in a laboratory
experiment designed to prove how “smart” dogs are), it gives us an opportunity
to examine whether the current models of behavior can satisfactorily explain
the anomaly.
The Pack Leader
Perspective.
We’re told by alpha theorists that dogs have a deeply-embedded instinct to obey a strong authority figure, or alpha male. If that instinct were holding true in Athens, wouldn’t the dogs be obeying the police, and not siding with the protesters? And if these dogs see the protesters as alpha males, which is possible, I suppose—as long as you ignore the fact that dogs can’t think conceptually or symbolically—then why are these animals acting in such a highly independent manner? They never look to the rioters for cues on how to behave. No one is telling them what to do. They just show up on their own and do whatever they feel like.
We’re told by alpha theorists that dogs have a deeply-embedded instinct to obey a strong authority figure, or alpha male. If that instinct were holding true in Athens, wouldn’t the dogs be obeying the police, and not siding with the protesters? And if these dogs see the protesters as alpha males, which is possible, I suppose—as long as you ignore the fact that dogs can’t think conceptually or symbolically—then why are these animals acting in such a highly independent manner? They never look to the rioters for cues on how to behave. No one is telling them what to do. They just show up on their own and do whatever they feel like.
The Behavioral
Science Explanation.
Behavioral scientists would tell us that the dogs’ behaviors are being reinforced. “It doesn’t matter what the reinforcement is,” they would tell us. “If it’s a learned behavior, then there must be some form of reinforcement taking place.” Yet according to the AP, the dogs “are very frightened when riot police use stun grenades.” If the dogs still attend these demonstrations, despite such strong aversive experiences, what could be so reinforcing for them?
Behavioral scientists would tell us that the dogs’ behaviors are being reinforced. “It doesn’t matter what the reinforcement is,” they would tell us. “If it’s a learned behavior, then there must be some form of reinforcement taking place.” Yet according to the AP, the dogs “are very frightened when riot police use stun grenades.” If the dogs still attend these demonstrations, despite such strong aversive experiences, what could be so reinforcing for them?
The Dog-as-Predator,
Police-as-Prey Theory.
Both the alpha theory and operant conditioning have lost much of their sheen in the scientific community recently, if not in the dog training world. For the alpha theory this may be due, in part, to the fact that wolves who live near garbage dumps don’t form packs. And since coyotes sometimes do, but only when they need to hunt large prey, pack formation is now seen as a function of prey size, nothing more.
Both the alpha theory and operant conditioning have lost much of their sheen in the scientific community recently, if not in the dog training world. For the alpha theory this may be due, in part, to the fact that wolves who live near garbage dumps don’t form packs. And since coyotes sometimes do, but only when they need to hunt large prey, pack formation is now seen as a function of prey size, nothing more.
Still, we usually think of
prey as running for their lives. In this case, the police are standing their
ground and moving toward, not away from, the protesters. They’re also firing
tear gas and stun guns at them. Still, in most cases the police are more
passive in nature (a prey-like quality), while the protesters are more
animated.
Could this be the answer?
An Energy Theory.
As my regular readers know, I’m a proponent of an energy theory of behavior; one that states that all canine behavior and learning can be described through some very simple principles of energy, such as attraction and resistance, and tension and release. Are these dogs feeling the tension in the streets, and trying to find a way to release their own tension? This seems plausible. But why are these dogs so attracted to the protesters?
As my regular readers know, I’m a proponent of an energy theory of behavior; one that states that all canine behavior and learning can be described through some very simple principles of energy, such as attraction and resistance, and tension and release. Are these dogs feeling the tension in the streets, and trying to find a way to release their own tension? This seems plausible. But why are these dogs so attracted to the protesters?
The Darwinian
Perspective.
Since evolution is a continuous process, could we find an answer to the puzzle here? If so, perhaps the following syllogism might explain things:
Since evolution is a continuous process, could we find an answer to the puzzle here? If so, perhaps the following syllogism might explain things:
1) Evolution is a process
of change, where overall tendency is for simpler forms evolve into those that
are more complex. 2) The complexity of modern human culture is the result of
evolutionary changes, some of which came about because of our close
relationship with domesticated dogs. 3) Since the goal of the protesters is to
implement change, and the goal of the government is to resist it, dogs are
acting as agents for change/evolution.
The Freudian Angle.
Sigmund Freud’s ideas on consciousness were derived, in part, from Darwin’s theory. I’ve written a few articles here explaining why I think Freud is relevant to understanding dogs, in part because the human/canine bond is a reflection of the Freudian dynamic of the Id and Ego, i.e., the dog’s owner acts as a governing mechanism for the dog’s wildest impulses2. I also wrote an article explaining how I think dogs are capable of sensing our desires and acting on them. With all this in mind:
Sigmund Freud’s ideas on consciousness were derived, in part, from Darwin’s theory. I’ve written a few articles here explaining why I think Freud is relevant to understanding dogs, in part because the human/canine bond is a reflection of the Freudian dynamic of the Id and Ego, i.e., the dog’s owner acts as a governing mechanism for the dog’s wildest impulses2. I also wrote an article explaining how I think dogs are capable of sensing our desires and acting on them. With all this in mind:
1) Human consciousness
operates via two energetic mechanisms, the Id and the Ego, a dynamic that can
also be seen in how dogs relate to their owners. 2) Every society has its own
Id (the unrestrained impulses of its people) and Ego (a government designed to
keep a lid on the aggressive energies of its citizens). 3) Since dogs are
almost pure Id, they gravitate more toward the side of the anarchists than to
the police.
Quite frankly, we may not
have enough data to come to any solid conclusions about why the “riot dogs”
have joined the protesters, or even if they have. Still, it’s clear that the old ways of looking at
canine behavior and learning, fall terribly short in explaining what’s going
on.
In my article, “Why Do Dogs
Like to Kiss Us?” I said that a wolf makes a living with his teeth
while a dog makes a living with his heart. On the face of it, this sounds like
a feel-good homily you’d find stitched on a pillow at a doggie boutique. But
it’s actually true. In order to be accepted into our homes dogs had to
sublimate their urge to bite into pro-social behaviors, just as anyone living
in a civilized society has to sublimate their aggression to avoid being
ostracized or sent to jail. And while no dog has the mental capacity to
understand what it means to submit to a human being’s superior rank or status,
neither does any dog have the ability to not submit to our wishes and desires,
even when we’re unaware that we’re communicating those things to our dogs.
The protesters want
change. Dogs are designed to help them out.
Footnotes:
1) The New York Times
reports that the Greek government may be losing $30 billion a year to tax
evasion by the rich—to which the politicians look the other way. The Wall
Street Journal estimates the losses at $20.5 billion a year. So if the Greek
government simply collected past-due taxes from the last seven years, they
would have considerably more than they received from the EU/IMF bail-out
package, and if they collected these taxes going forward, the burden of
recovery on the middle class would be much less onerous and more palatable.
(from the Chicago Sun Times, “Letters to the
Editor“)
2) One report about the
dogs’ behavior suggested that they’re exhibiting “attention-seeking” behaviors,
which to me shows that they may be more social/sociable than the rest of the
city’s strays. If this is so, it would also suggest that their aim in “joining”
the protesters is not to seek attention, but to reduce their own internal
tension and stress. Why? Because the more social a dog is, the more of his
instinctive, predatory nature he’s had to either sublimate or suppress in order
to get along with others.
Sublimation would (in
simplest terms) mean that the dog is redirecting his aggressive energy into
“overfriendliness” (licking, jumping up on people), or into playing games like
fetch and tug, or into utilitarian behaviors such as herding, pointing,
retrieving, etc. It’s unlikely that stray dogs would have an outlet for their
aggression through any of these behaviors, except perhaps by playing with one
another. Meanwhile, suppressing their aggression would mean that its energy
would become more and more compressed (or “dammed up,” in Freud’s words),
creating a feeling of deep emotional, and possibly even physical discomfort.
(By the way, much of a dog’s ability to suppress or sublimate aggression is
genetic.)
Another likely factor is
that, for the most part, the dogs who are living on the streets are, by
default, those who already have a keen aptitude for sublimating or suppressing
their aggressive impulses. Otherwise, when the animal control officers come to
take them in and vaccinate and neuter them, the dogs would be more likely to
bark and snarl and bite them, which would result in the dog being more likely
to get a different kind of injection than those for parvo, distemper, etc.,
i.e., a lethal injection.
So the more social a dog
is, the more he’s suppressed or sublimated his aggression. And if the dog has
no satisfying release available to offload that “dammed-up” energy, the more
such a dog would seek an opportunity to relieve the discomfort that comes with
it, which may be the closest thing to the real reason these dogs have joined
the rioters.
To me, this shows how
Kevin Behan’s energy theory,
some aspects of Freudian psychology, and Darwin’s theory
of evolution are intertwined, and how together they make more sense than any
possible explanation given through the alpha theory or behavioral science.
No comments:
Post a Comment