Originally
published in slightly different form on May 10, 2012 at PsychologyToday.com.
“Behavioral scientists have long relied
on the ‘law of effect’ to describe how ‘rewards’ and ‘punishments’ control
learning: Behaviors followed by rewards increase, whereas those followed by
punishments decrease. But such rewards and punishments are more than objects in
the outside world; they can change affective brain dynamics. Thus, we can
envision ‘laws of affect’ whereby … changes in emotional states promote
emotional learning.”
—Jaak Panksepp (“Empathy and the Laws of Affect,” 2011.)
Positive
Reinforcement vs Positive Emotions
In my last post I talked about ways to deal with aggression in rescue dogs. One form of canine aggression is the dog who barks furiously at other dogs he meets on his walks. This behavior is often difficult to fix, which means that it has to have been reinforced in some deep and long-lasting way.
In my last post I talked about ways to deal with aggression in rescue dogs. One form of canine aggression is the dog who barks furiously at other dogs he meets on his walks. This behavior is often difficult to fix, which means that it has to have been reinforced in some deep and long-lasting way.
But how? What causes the
dog to repeat the behavior and not give it up? What is he getting out of it?
What’s the payoff?
One hypothesis is that the
dog barks in order to increase the distance between himself and the other dog,
thus some call this a “distance-increasing behavior.” Personally, I don’t think
that’s why the dog barks, but let’s say it is, and analyze how that might work.
If the reinforcement for
barking is the eventual reduction of physical distance, proximity, etc.,
between the two dogs, how is that information processed in the dog’s mind? Is
this a function of hypothetical thinking, involving the intangible concepts of
space, time, and distance? “If I bark at that dog long enough he’ll be scared
and move away from me.” Or does it come through a change in the dog’s feeling
states; the dog barks because the other dog stimulates strong visceral feelings
of social attraction and social resistance, and he stops barking when those
feelings (particularly the feelings of social resistance) subside?
If we look at the behavior
based on The Law of Effect, we’re automatically dealing with
intangibles and hypotheticals (space, time, and distance are
intangible; the hypotheticals are what the other dog might or might not be
thinking or feeling). But if we look at the behavior as being motivated and
reinforced by the very real sensation of changes in physical pressure felt in
the dog’s body, we’re dealing with things that can not only be felt by the dog,
they can be measured by science. (Space and distance can’t be measured except
comparatively through physical objects, and time is only measured in
relative intervals.)
In this model, there’s no
operant conditioning going on (since the dog isn’t operating on the
environment, but on himself). The dog simply experiences an uncomfortable
feeling of physical pressure in his body and does whatever he can to feel
better.
But is this an accurate explanation?
Adaptive Pressures,
Behavioral Pressures?
Evolutionary biologists tell us that in the wild animals are subject to “adaptive pressures.” If an individual animal within a species doesn’t adapt it isn’t likely to survive. But how do animals adapt to changing environmental pressures? Certainly one of the ways would be through changes in their behavior.
Evolutionary biologists tell us that in the wild animals are subject to “adaptive pressures.” If an individual animal within a species doesn’t adapt it isn’t likely to survive. But how do animals adapt to changing environmental pressures? Certainly one of the ways would be through changes in their behavior.
So what if we applied this
process to animal behavior in general, and looked at it as being motivated by
internal and external stimuli that provoke pressures, pressures that are
actually felt by individual animals as changes in their physiological and/or
affective states?
Every living organism is
an energy system, from the human brain to the simplest single-celled organism.
When new energy is added to any living system it has to either be absorbed or
gotten rid of. When new energy is added to a cell—in the form of nutrients that
keep the cell alive—the cell expands, creating pressure, “motivating” it to
divide.
The brain doesn’t expand
the way a single cell does, but when new energy enters the mind’s awareness (in
the form of internal or external stimuli) it too is subject to psychological
pressures. The stronger the stimuli, the more we feel pressured to act to
relieve those feelings.
Looked at this way, the
presence of another dog creates palpable feelings of pressure the first dog can
feel in his chest, the pounding of his heart, etc., brought on no doubt by fear
and the production of adrenaline. The closer the other dog gets, the more
pressure the first dog feels, and the more he barks. The farther away the other
dog is, the less pressure he feels, and the less he barks. (There are other
factors, like eye contact, whether the other dog is also acting in an
aggressive manner, etc.)
So the barking and its
conditioning (classical, not operant) are actually by-products of physiological
sensations felt within the dog’s body.
The Relentless
Search for Pleasure (or Relief from Pressure)
Sigmund Freud suggested that almost all behavior is based on a relentless search for pleasure, with pleasure defined as the release brought about by being able to relieve internal feelings of pressure, tension, or stress. He also suggested that this need to relieve feelings of pressure is so strong it often results in a compulsion to repeat behaviors that had previously brought about those pleasurable and satisfying feelings.
Sigmund Freud suggested that almost all behavior is based on a relentless search for pleasure, with pleasure defined as the release brought about by being able to relieve internal feelings of pressure, tension, or stress. He also suggested that this need to relieve feelings of pressure is so strong it often results in a compulsion to repeat behaviors that had previously brought about those pleasurable and satisfying feelings.
So the more physiological
pressure an animal is feeling the more pleasure he’s likely to experience when
that pressure is released. This is the reinforcement, the payoff for the
barking dog, not the increase in distance between the two dogs.
Freud’s ideas about
pleasure formed part of the theoretical foundation for the concept of positive
reinforcement, the difference being that positive reinforcements can only be
determined to have taken place after the fact by observing increases in
behavioral tendencies. Meanwhile, thanks to Dr. Jaak Panksepp and others,
affective states (or emotional states) can now be observed, quantified, and
measured in real time.
The pleasure principle
also explains the problem of addiction, where the addict keeps repeating the
same behavior over and over even though he’s repeatedly “punished” for doing
it, and when the behavior is no longer being reinforced. That’s because the
abuser isn’t seeking “rewards” but the feeling of release. This could also
explain obsessive/compulsive behaviors in dogs, and why this type of aggression
can be hard to fix, particularly when the “compulsion to repeat” is part of the
process.
Solving the Problem
The behavioral science solution is usually to give the obsessive barker an alternative behavior like sitting for a treat, hand-targeting, the “watch-me” game, etc. The dominance trainer’s solution usually comes through physical punishment and intimidation (as in the Cesar Millan video discussed in my last post).
The behavioral science solution is usually to give the obsessive barker an alternative behavior like sitting for a treat, hand-targeting, the “watch-me” game, etc. The dominance trainer’s solution usually comes through physical punishment and intimidation (as in the Cesar Millan video discussed in my last post).
How do those of us who use
Natural Dog Training (and/or neo-Freudian) techniques solve the problem of the
obsessive barker?
Instead of giving the dog
an alternative behavior we give the dog an alternative outlet for the pressure
he’s feeling, a safety valve for his internal pressure cooker. We generally do
this in two basic ways, neither of which are directly related to the specific
behavior of barking. We hand feed the dog all his meals outdoors, using “The Pushing Exercise,” and
we teach the dog to play tug-of-war, away from other dogs, in a safe, secure
area.
In many cases, by simply
playing tug regularly, to the point that the dog is investing all his energy
into biting the toy as hard as he can, we’re able then to walk him past other
dogs without incident (though in some cases it helps to have the tug toy ready,
just in case).
I could be wrong, but I
think this may be what Dr. Panksepp was talking about when suggesting that we
look at behavior through the laws of affect rather than the laws of effect.
Since he’s also been instrumental in creating a new awareness of the value of
rough-and-tumble play—in both animals and humans—he’d probably approve of
playing tug as well.
“Life Is an Adventure—Where Will Your Dog Take You?”
Join Me on Facebook!
Follow Me on Twitter!
Join the Rescue Dog Owners Support Group!
Join Me on Facebook!
Follow Me on Twitter!
Join the Rescue Dog Owners Support Group!
No comments:
Post a Comment